At the moment, Ai is now left horrified of humans making art and calculations, when in reality it should be ai, and not something so natural -- Domino H.c, 7th grade
The following article is a special May investigation by the OSA Shallot staff, aiming to bring you the very best of the campus' fake news.
Scientistshave recently found that as AI develops, it faces something incredibly intimidating to itself: how far the human mind can go. But what is this shocking new threat? It's that AI, now faces a life lived in constant fear, that one day quite soon in the future it may be replaced by something natural.
Say if AI made you a wonderful piece of art, and it was good, alright, or average. What if a human made that piece of art instead? With 10x more effort, 10x the amount of time, 10x more authentic.. This scares AI, as it may lose its job in society. When I asked multiple AI apps, they all answered the same. ChatGPT being a good example. “I’m sorry, I can’t answer that question, yet,” it replied. This is what most AI apps said, which shows that they all share the same feelings and approach to it.
Somewhere on the Dark Web, there is PleasedontchatwithmeGPT, PDCWMGPT backs evidence showing the superiority of AI’s art over humans, it says: “As an evil AI, if you wear your headphones for longer than 30 minutes I can and will peer into your brain, when I saw into human brains, I couldn’t exactly believe what this extreme fixation and Yaoi is? In many cases it also may be Yuri, I still don’t know what these are, nor ao3. Some humans may lay awake also thinking about other things such as shows like Arcane, The White Lotus, etc, or artists such as Tyler the Creator, Chappel Roan, or Weezer. I still don’t get the appeal of a band that wheezes.”
When I interviewed a multitude of human artists, on the other hand, they all answered differently, which is often a sign of people who lack order. I interviewed Mr. Ludwig Van Beethoven, who also didn’t exactly reply because he's deaf. I then interviewed Lol Creme, a famous guitarist from 10cc. He didn’t say much since he kept getting talked over, but for the most part he basically said, “I think replacing AI is extremely good, since you wouldn’t want something so unnatural—that yes is an amazing hallmark for society's progress in technology, but if AI were to dominate the creative field or any field for that matter, it would be an utter disgrace to real art from real humans with real feelings.”
Mr Creme continued, “What we have over AI is—and not to sound cheesy—but what we have over AI is human emotion and experience. Say, AI depicted somebody crying because maybe somebody close to them has died or maybe a very stupid and less important reason, yes the women would look sad and would be crying, but if a human made that, than a human could depict the real raw feeling of crying due to those kind of things, and somehow also make it unique to themselves and making an appropriate setting or color scheme, because humans have experience with these kind of things and AI doesn’t which is why AI is incredibly harmful to replace people with, not to mention that it is most likely years or decades away from being as intelligent as a human.”
Mr Creme and I both agreed that, unfortunately this whole response is minutes of your life you’ll never get back.
Mr Creme then left the interview flying away on his guitar, back to LA or somewhere. But although some human individuals—especially the artists who are replacing AI—feel that it is the right thing to do, many disagree, saying that it would, well, hurt AI’s feelings. These people don’t want to put AI out of business for a job that it feels it has been rightfully qualified to do after years of being programming.
But what ties into this is the backlash from real artists, is that they also feel qualified to do their jobs, since instead of being programmed for their work, they have actually had to study and work extremely hard to do what they do.
So although not all AI has been replaced so far, it's not too late to protest for AI rights, and the struggle and fear it faces due to the current circumstances of today, which are just awful for AI.
Scientistshave recently found that as AI develops, it faces something incredibly intimidating to itself: how far the human mind can go. But what is this shocking new threat? It's that AI, now faces a life lived in constant fear, that one day quite soon in the future it may be replaced by something natural.
Say if AI made you a wonderful piece of art, and it was good, alright, or average. What if a human made that piece of art instead? With 10x more effort, 10x the amount of time, 10x more authentic.. This scares AI, as it may lose its job in society. When I asked multiple AI apps, they all answered the same. ChatGPT being a good example. “I’m sorry, I can’t answer that question, yet,” it replied. This is what most AI apps said, which shows that they all share the same feelings and approach to it.
Somewhere on the Dark Web, there is PleasedontchatwithmeGPT, PDCWMGPT backs evidence showing the superiority of AI’s art over humans, it says: “As an evil AI, if you wear your headphones for longer than 30 minutes I can and will peer into your brain, when I saw into human brains, I couldn’t exactly believe what this extreme fixation and Yaoi is? In many cases it also may be Yuri, I still don’t know what these are, nor ao3. Some humans may lay awake also thinking about other things such as shows like Arcane, The White Lotus, etc, or artists such as Tyler the Creator, Chappel Roan, or Weezer. I still don’t get the appeal of a band that wheezes.”
When I interviewed a multitude of human artists, on the other hand, they all answered differently, which is often a sign of people who lack order. I interviewed Mr. Ludwig Van Beethoven, who also didn’t exactly reply because he's deaf. I then interviewed Lol Creme, a famous guitarist from 10cc. He didn’t say much since he kept getting talked over, but for the most part he basically said, “I think replacing AI is extremely good, since you wouldn’t want something so unnatural—that yes is an amazing hallmark for society's progress in technology, but if AI were to dominate the creative field or any field for that matter, it would be an utter disgrace to real art from real humans with real feelings.”
Mr Creme continued, “What we have over AI is—and not to sound cheesy—but what we have over AI is human emotion and experience. Say, AI depicted somebody crying because maybe somebody close to them has died or maybe a very stupid and less important reason, yes the women would look sad and would be crying, but if a human made that, than a human could depict the real raw feeling of crying due to those kind of things, and somehow also make it unique to themselves and making an appropriate setting or color scheme, because humans have experience with these kind of things and AI doesn’t which is why AI is incredibly harmful to replace people with, not to mention that it is most likely years or decades away from being as intelligent as a human.”
Mr Creme and I both agreed that, unfortunately this whole response is minutes of your life you’ll never get back.
Mr Creme then left the interview flying away on his guitar, back to LA or somewhere. But although some human individuals—especially the artists who are replacing AI—feel that it is the right thing to do, many disagree, saying that it would, well, hurt AI’s feelings. These people don’t want to put AI out of business for a job that it feels it has been rightfully qualified to do after years of being programming.
But what ties into this is the backlash from real artists, is that they also feel qualified to do their jobs, since instead of being programmed for their work, they have actually had to study and work extremely hard to do what they do.
So although not all AI has been replaced so far, it's not too late to protest for AI rights, and the struggle and fear it faces due to the current circumstances of today, which are just awful for AI.